One person.
One record.
$3,000 flat.
A Google Knowledge Panel build for an individual human being. Not a brand, not a company page, not a personal branding retainer with a panel mentioned somewhere on slide nine. One person, one file, one fee, and a published window that does not move after you have paid.
Half at intake. Half when an identifier or a live card is evidenced.
The build window. Everything inside our control happens here.
When the panel tends to appear on the bare name. Google's clock, not ours.
Nothing live at twelve months, the whole fee comes back.
Nine things, and none of them is a report
Everything currently held under your name, what the collisions are, and which of the four routes your case falls into. Delivered as findings you can act on, not a PDF with a cover page.
Every place your name, title, dates, affiliation or photograph disagree with each other across the web, and the fix for each one, in the order that matters.
One page on your own domain, written and marked up so a machine can read the claims without inference. This is the reference every other source gets checked against.
Entries in the registers, catalogues and indexes Google treats as reliable. Unglamorous, slow, and the part that does most of the work.
Coverage on other people's sites that names you, published by people with nothing to gain from saying it. The slow half of the job and the half that cannot be faked.
Where the case genuinely qualifies. Where it does not, you are told so rather than having an item created that gets deleted in a fortnight and leaves a mark.
One master photograph, used everywhere, in the right places. Image consistency is one of the cheapest confirmations a machine can make and one of the most commonly wasted.
When the record appears, the exact sequence, the screens, and what each rejection reason means. You do it. Your documents never leave your hands.
If the material is not there, you are told before you pay, with the reason and with what would change it. This happens to roughly a third of the people who ask.
The distinction that gets hidden
A live file and a panel that appears on your plain name are not the same milestone, and the gap between them can be months. Almost nobody selling this work says that before the invoice.
Stage one is the file existing. Search its reference number and the card comes back. It is real, it is the hard part, and it is what most of the AI assistants are reading when they answer a question about you.
Stage two is the panel firing on the name itself. Type the name, the box appears. This is the one people picture when they imagine the outcome, and it depends on Google deciding your record is the dominant answer for that string.
Four of the eight records shown on this site are at stage one right now. They are on the site anyway.
Two stage-one records and two stage-two records, captured the same day, 31 August 2026. The difference is visible if you know what to look at, which is the point.
The one thing every claimed panel has
It is not follower count and it is not a good website.
It is a body of independent material that a machine can reconcile into one person. Everything on the build list exists to produce that, and the test on this site exists so you can see roughly where you stand before anybody quotes you a price.
Four builds run at a time.
Say what you want on the record.
Email with your full name as you want it spelled forever, a link to anything published about you by somebody else, and one line on why the record matters this year rather than next.
You get a straight read back: proceed, or not yet with the reason. There is no call required to get that answer, and no call is required to get a price either, because the price is on this page.
What gets you turned away
- Nothing published about you by anybody other than you.
- A name collision with someone materially more covered, and no plan to differentiate.
- A need for the panel by a fixed date. The date is not ours to give.
- Wanting the panel to say something the evidence does not support.
Before you email
Why a flat fee and not a retainer?
Because a retainer pays for months and this work is not measured in months, it is measured in whether a record exists. A flat fee puts the risk on the side of the table that can actually do something about it.
What happens in the first sixty to ninety days?
Everything we control. The audit, the contradiction sweep, the home base, the structured sources, the outreach that produces third-party coverage. After that the work is maintenance and patience, because the remaining variable is Google's own recrawl and reconciliation schedule.
Can you guarantee the panel?
No. Nobody can, and the ones who say otherwise are describing a screenshot rather than a record. What is guaranteed is the refund at twelve months and the fact that you will be told plainly, before you pay anything, if we think the material is not there.
Why do you turn people away?
Because for roughly a third of enquiries the honest answer is that there is not enough independent material for anyone to work with, and the fix is not a consultant. It is publishing something, taking a role somebody writes about, or finishing the book. Taking money in that position is selling a wait.
I already have a panel and it is wrong.
That is a different and usually shorter job. Say so in the first line of your email and include the search that shows the error, because the route for correcting a live record has nothing in common with the route for creating one.
Is my name too common for this?
Possibly, and it is worth knowing early. A name collision means Google has two candidates and no reason to prefer either, which turns a six month job into a much longer one. The test on this site asks about it directly.